Functional speech outcomes after laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy.

OBJECTIVE To compare and contrast functional speech outcomes of patients having undergone total laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy who use tracheoesophageal speech as their primary mode of communication. DESIGN Group comparison design. SETTING Adult acute tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS Thirty patients who underwent total laryngectomy and 13 who underwent pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal interposition reconstruction. All patients used tracheoesophageal speech. INTERVENTION Group comparisons across measures of speech intelligibility, voice quality, tracheoesophageal speech use, voice satisfaction and levels of perceived voice disability, handicap, and well-being/distress. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The existence of any significant differences between the 2 groups on measures of intelligibility, voice quality, tracheoesophageal speech use, and voice satisfaction and levels of voice disability, handicap, and well-being/distress. RESULTS Statistical comparisons confirmed reduced functional intelligibility (P<.05), reduced vocal quality (P<.01), and higher levels of disability (P<.05) in the pharyngolaryngectomy group. However, no significant difference was observed between the proportion of patients classified as "successful" tracheoesophageal speech users in either group. Low levels of handicap and high levels of patient well-being were recorded in both groups. CONCLUSION Despite the perceptual differences in voice quality and intelligibility observed between the 2 groups, tracheoesophageal speech that is functional, effective, and perceived by the patients as satisfactory can be achieved after total laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal interposition reconstruction.